The Christchurch earthquake: ultrasound in a mass trauma event

نویسنده

  • Rex de Ryke
چکیده

Brief background Christchurch Public Hospital (CPH) and Christchurch Women’s Hospital (CWH) occupy the same physical site but are distinctively different buildings. They are sited close to the Avon River and Hagley Park and about a 10 minute walk to the central business district. CWH opened in 2005 as a “state-of-the-art” tertiary level women’s hospital that accommodates a tertiary level neonatal intensive care unit. It is built on a foundation system offering the most sophisticated earthquake protection available. CWH has five levels, with the radiology department on the ground floor (one x-ray room, four ultrasound rooms, radiologist reporting stations, sonographers work room, fetal medicine scanning and consulting rooms). Christchurch Hospital consists of two major buildings, the Riverside block, completed in 1980, and the Parkside block, completed in 1991. It is the major tertiary level hospital in New Zealand’s South Island, covering a large geographical area. The Emergency Department (ED) is located on the ground floor and is one of the busiest in the southern hemisphere (+70,000 visits per year) and had just completed a much needed upgrade before the earthquakes. Two x-ray rooms and a trauma room are part of the ED radiology services. The main radiology department is on level one of the public hospital campus and is located between the Riverside and Parkside blocks. It has three CT scanners, two DSA rooms, one MRI unit, five ultrasound rooms (including vascular lab) and general x-ray rooms. Sonographers work between the Christchurch Public and Women’s departments on a rotational basis. Although shaken by the 7.3 magnitude earthquake of 4th September 2010, the hospital suffered only minor damage and fortunately there were no fatalities. The September earthquake had however shown us that there was a vulnerability to power supplied to radiology, including x-ray services in ED, which was being addressed at the time of the February 2011 earthquake. February 22nd, 12.51 hours Unlike many natural disasters such as floods and extreme weather events there are no warnings with earthquakes. This was the case on the 22nd February 2011. Most of the sonographers on duty that day were getting ready to leave the tea room at CWH to return to work at CPH and CWH. Two of the team had left the department and gone into town. At 12.51 hrs the earthquake struck. Parts of the tea room ceiling fell down, staff struggled to stand up, non-secured items flew across the room and windows imploded. In addition, the power went off, came back on and went off again at irregular intervals throughout the next few hours. The shaking went on for approximately 37 seconds however the aftershocks were ongoing; with the largest being 5.9 in magnitude at approximately 14.51 hrs. We were to learn later that the magnitude of the 1251 hr quake was 6.3 in magnitude, which sounded relatively low for those who experienced it. However it was centred only 5 km deep and 10 km from the city centre. It had acceleration forces of up to 2.2 G (among the highest ever recorded) with the greatest vertical accelerations on record. It had caused major devastation throughout the central city and surrounding areas (particularly in the central city and eastern suburbs). There was widespread loss of power and communications, extensive flooding and liquefaction,1 roads were in gridlock as people tried to move out of the city to safety and make contact with loved ones. Soon there was also a loss of water and sewage services. We had no real idea of what was happening outside the hospital, and many outside the hospital had no idea if the hospital itself was still standing or functional. The Christchurch earthquake: ultrasound in a mass trauma event

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Evaluating Seismic Effects on a Water Supply Network and Quantifying Post-Earthquake Recovery

This paper summarises the impact of major earthquakes, 2010–2011, on Christchurch’s water supply network and what recovery measures have been applied, what worked well, what did not and why. A number of issues related to the open nature of the Christchurch water supply network were identified during earthquakes. It was difficult to manage large water supply pressure zones during the post-earthq...

متن کامل

Did the September 2010 (Darfield) earthquake trigger the February 2011 (Christchurch) event?

We have investigated the possible cause-and-effect relationship due to stress transfer between two earthquakes that occurred near Christchurch, New Zealand, in September 2010 and in February 2011. The Mw 7.1 Darfield (Canterbury) event took place along a previously unrecognized fault. The Mw 6.3 Christchurch earthquake, generated by a thrust fault, occurred approximately five months later, 6 km...

متن کامل

The Christchurch Earthquake: Crush Injury, Neuropathic Pain, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

On February 22, 2011, an earthquake of magnitude 6.3 struck Christchurch, New Zealand. The peak ground acceleration, a measure of the shaking or intensity of an earthquake, was one of the highest ever recorded worldwide. One hundred and eighty-five people lost their lives; many others were injured. Two cases both involving young women are presented; they sustained crush injuries to limbs after ...

متن کامل

Acute Myocardial Infarction and Stress Cardiomyopathy following the Christchurch Earthquakes

BACKGROUND Christchurch, New Zealand, was struck by 2 major earthquakes at 4:36 am on 4 September 2010, magnitude 7.1 and at 12:51 pm on 22 February 2011, magnitude 6.3. Both events caused widespread destruction. Christchurch Hospital was the region's only acute care hospital. It remained functional following both earthquakes. We were able to examine the effects of the 2 earthquakes on acute ca...

متن کامل

Object-based Classification of Earthquake Damage from High-resolution Optical Imagery Using Machine Learning

Object-based approaches to the segmentation and supervised classification of remotely-sensed images yield more promising results compared to traditional pixelbased approaches. However, the development of an object-based approach presents challenges in terms of algorithm selection and parameter tuning. Subjective methods and trial and error are often used, but time consuming and yield less than ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 15  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012